Let me precede this post to tell let you know that this review is going to be short and bitter (certainly not sweet) as I look back on this movie, which has got to be the worst sequel in the Halloween franchise. All you have to do is think about two of the actors cast in this movie—Busta Rhymes and Tyra Banks—and you’ll understand why without needing an explanation.
When this movie was first announced and described, my gut told me to avoid it when it finally opened in theaters, but I didn’t listen to it. It was churning and gurgling, yet I turned a deaf ear. After watching this film, I’ll never doubt my instincts again.
2002’s Halloween: Resurrection has a saving grace, however (and it’s hard to believe that it does after watching this train wreck of a film), so it may be worth a glance just for this sole reason—the inclusion of a Jamie Lee Curtis cameo. But her scenes are at the very beginning and makes it that much more difficult to get through the rest of the flick.
Well, without further ado, and to avoid prolonging the discussion of this film, here’s the breakdown of the film.
Freddie Harris (Busta Rhymes) and his partner, Nora (Tyra Banks), run an internet reality show and decide on featuring the abandoned Myers residence with six college students spending the night inside. As luck would have it, Michael Myers (Brad Loree) returns, aiming to kill them all off.
One thing I always tell people when they ask me about this film is that it’s worth watching for the first ten or fifteen minutes, but that’s it. The rest is such a stupid mess of a movie, as Michael Myers shows up and kills each character until there are only two left (and one of them I wished he killed). It’s actually hard to believe that this film started off so strong, giving us some great exposition as to how Michael Myers is still alive, I almost believe the beginning was just deleted scenes from the previous film. I constantly ask myself, when watching this debacle, “How did they give this film such a strong beginning only to give us a bunch of shit for the remainder?” Basically, as soon as Michael Myers hands over his butcher knife to the mental institute patient who knows all the stats of serial killers, you can turn off the movie and chalk it up to the shortest Halloween entry in the series of films.
Anyway, say what you will about all the other films in the Halloween canon, at least there was constantly a reason for Michael’s killing spree in every outing he was featured in: he was always trying to kill off the last of his family. Yet, in this one—*SPOILER*—he finally achieved that goal (albeit, Laurie’s son is presumably still alive, but I guess Mike had forgotten about him) and decided to go to his old house and kill off a bunch of kids just for the hell of it. Why didn’t they make the movie about him getting to John? Even if they couldn’t get Josh Hartnett to reprise his role, they could’ve gotten someone else. Anything would’ve been better than what they had done here.
Finally, I’ve got to ask—Rick Rosenthal, how did you direct such classics like Halloween II and Bad Boys (the Sean Penn film), but turn in a dud like Halloween: Resurrection? I’m sure you wanted to do something different and go with what was popular at the turn of the century, like found footage films and the reality TV boom, but it definitely didn’t work here.
Anyway, there you have it—short and bitter. My final “bit”?
Skip it. Unless you want to see the first fifteen minutes of the film, I wouldn’t bother with this idiotic flop of a film. If anything, I guess we can blame this movie for rebooting the franchise and giving it to Rob Zombie to twist it up. Hopefully Dimension and Akkad will get something together and get the Halloween series back to its glory days…it’s been too long.
Thanks for reading and Happy Halloween!